War Mongers, Religious Fanatics, and De-Evolution
Maybe the New Wave band Devo had it right all along: human kind is de-evolving back into the dark and murky past when superstition, fear of science and new ideas ruled the world. After the Lawrence, Kansas School Board's decision to teach Intelligent Design in their schools, a Devo fan suggested that it might be a good idea for them to perform in Lawrence. The band replied:
I think [the decision] opens the door to having Devolution taught in schools along side both Intelligent Design and Evolution since it's the only school of thought to bridge the gap between science and creationism. The argument, though sweetly tautological, is that the ruling in favor of teaching Intelligent Design as science is in itself proof of Devolution.
Maybe human evolution reached its peak with Albert Einstein and his warnings about war with atomic weapons destroying the world. Perhaps George W. Bush is the pus which has oozed to the surface of the fast-food fed, television addicted boil on the ass of America. As one of my friends used to say, "America gets the president it deserves." But I thought that the post-war dream promised a new era of science and enlightened thought. John F. Kennedy's 1960 nomination acceptance speech captured the spirit of those times:
We stand at the edge of a New Frontier—the frontier of unfulfilled hopes and dreams. It will deal with unsolved problems of peace and war, unconquered pockets of ignorance and prejudice, unanswered questions of poverty and surplus.
One of John F. Kennedy's achievements was establishing the Peace Corps in 1961. The Peace Corps was created to be a positive outreach in contrast to military conflicts which had brought so much death and destruction to the world. In the 1930s H.G. Wells wrote a novel called The Shape of Things to Come (adapted into a film called Things to Come) which imagined a fragmented post-WWII Europe made up of little Kingdoms dominated by war lords who learn to hate the civilized past because it threatens to destroy their isolated positions of power. The civilized parts of the world send out emissaries to offer brotherhood and cooperation to the fractured city-states. Of course, the war lords can only stall the inevitable for so long. Now it seems that religious and ethnic fanaticism will never be tamed by modernity. The Peace Corps now seems like a quaint idea, like the Geneva Conventions, and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
After WW II, George Orwell tried to warn the civilized world that the biggest threat to the future of humanity is the totalitarian state and its desire to control every aspect of people's lives. President Eisenhower warned the nation to "...guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex... Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together." Today we have neither security or liberty because we are led by corporate fascists who care only for ever-increasing profit regardless of the damage done to the world. America is being led by war profiteers who use fear as a weapon to squash dissent, intimidate the media, and bully those in government who dare to oppose their agenda. In the words of Smedley Darlington Butler:
War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
After the Cold War ended, we were all expecting the Peace Dividend. But fifteen years later we are now being told that World War III has just begun. And so the question must be asked why the Bush administration has used war, and the threat of military action, against all those we consider enemies. The answer can only be money and power. Pat Buchanan and I don't usually agree on many issues. But when it comes to Israel's hold over U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, he is one of the few voices of dissent on the right. Although his use of the words "un-American" and "un-Christian" are suspect, I admire his independence from the current political climate:
Let it be said: Israel has a right to defend herself, a right to counter-attack against Hezbollah and Hamas, a right to clean out bases from which Katyusha or Qassam rockets are being fired and a right to occupy land from which attacks are mounted on her people.
But what Israel is doing is imposing deliberate suffering on civilians, collective punishment on innocent people, to force them to do something they are powerless to do: disarm the gunmen among them. Such a policy violates international law and comports neither with our values nor our interests. It is un-American and un-Christian.
The problem for the Bush administration is its subservient role to Israel. Political pressure to support whatever Israel does in response to terrorist attacks only strengthens the Islamic radicals and weakens the influence of moderate and liberal forces in countries like Iran and Pakistan. By killing innocent civilians in Lebanon, Israel is assuring that Hezbollah-style militias will continue to find recruits for generations to come. You cannot defeat terrorism until you win the battle of ideas. Unfortunately, we have run out of ideas and are resorting to school yard bully tactics, and punishment of innocent civilians. Invade and bomb first - ask questions, and maybe negotiate later. The United Nations may not be perfect, but its charter is still relevant, regardless of what the new imperialists may think. These days, war is the new diplomacy in Washington and Jerusalem. A professional woman in Iraq recently discovered that she was not welcome at her job anymore because she is a woman. She said that Iraq has been set back fifty years. Devolution indeed.
Recent Comments